Facilitating open access in the behavioral sciences

 

Roxane de la Sablonnière1, Michel Sabourin1, & Émilie Auger1

 

1 Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal, C. P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada, Email: roxane.de.la.sablonniere@umontreal

 

 

 

In most fields of natural science and technology, such as physics, biology, environmental science and astronomy, significant improvements have been made in recent years in terms of open access. Open access reinforces scientific inquiry, encourages diversity of analysis, and strongly promotes new research by allowing researchers to study questions that were not initially planned. With open access, researchers from all over the world are encouraged to share and to use data. Although there are clear benefits to open access, there is one field where it remains problematic and uncommon: the behavioral sciences.  Because the behavioral sciences involve human participants, the protection of privacy and concern for confidentiality take priority over open access. Indeed, before collecting data, all researchers conducting research that involves human participants must seek the approval of an ethics committee for their project. When a project is approved, the usual norm among behavioral scientists is to include a consent form specifying that only the researcher and his/her assistants will have access to the data, making it impossible to have open access. We argue that it is possible to move toward open access in behavioral science and we will show how this can be done. Based on a well-known technique in social psychology, the foot in the door principle, we will propose concrete steps to achieve open access in fields where this norm has not yet been developed.